多元化护理干预对突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者焦虑情绪及生活质量的影响
徐妹
（常熟市第二人民医院耳鼻咽喉口腔科，江苏 常熟，215500）
浏览次数：130次 下载次数：443次
摘要：
目的 探讨多元化护理干预对突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者焦虑情绪及生活质量的影响。方法 将我院收治的86例突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者采用随机数字表法分为对照组（n=43）和观察组（n=43），对照组患者给予耳鼻咽喉科常规护理，观察组患者采用多元化护理干预模式，对比分析两组患者护理干预前、后的焦虑情绪及生活质量。结果 护理干预前，两组患者的SAS评 分、SF-36量表各维度评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；护理干预后，观察组患者的SAS评分明显低于护理干预前和 对照组（P<0.05），而SF-36量表各维度评分均明显高于护理干预前和对照组（P<0.05）。结论 多元化护理干预模式能有效改善突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者的焦虑情绪，提高其生活质量。
关键词：多元化护理干预；突发性耳聋耳鸣；焦虑情绪；生活质量
中图分类号：R473 文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)13-0159-02
Effect of diversified nursing intervention on anxiety and quality of life in patients with sudden deafness and tinnitus
XU Mei
(Department of Otolaryngology, Changshu Second People s Hospital, Changshu 215500, China)
ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the effect of diversified nursing intervention on anxiety and quality of life in patients with sudden deafness and tinnitus. Methods Eighty-six cases of patients with sudden deafness and tinnitus were divided into control group (n=43) and observation group (n=43) according to random number table. The control group received routine nursing, while the observation group accepted diversified nursing intervention. The anxiety and quality of life before and after nursing intervention between the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results Before nursing intervention, there were no significant differences on SAS score and SF-36 scale between the two groups. After nursing intervention, the SAS score of observation group was significantly lower than that before nursing intervention and the control group (P<0.05), and the scores of SF-36 scale were significantly higher than those before nursing intervention and the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Diversified nursing intervention can effectively improve the anxiety and the quality of life ofpatient with sudden deafness and tinnitus.
KEYWORDS: diversified nursing intervention; sudden deafness and tinnitus; anxiety; quality of life
参考文献：
[1] 陈玲.突发性耳聋患者急性应激反应及心理特点与护理干预体会[J].西南国防医药,2015,25(12):1375-1377.
[2] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会.突发性耳聋的诊断和治疗指南(2005 年)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(8):569.
[3] 汪向东,王希林,马弘援.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,2004:235-236.
[4] WARE JE JR,SHERBOURNE CD.The MOS 36 -item short -form health survey (SF-36):I.Conceptual framework and item selection[J].Med Care,1992,30(6):473-483.
[5] 陈赛,江美霞,张映芬.突发性耳聋病人焦虑状况分析及护理对策 [J].现代临床护理,2006,5(6):27-29.
[6] 张艳.多元化护理实施现状及思考[J].中国疗养医学,2012,21(8):710-711.
[7] 毛瑞英,王建辉,常文红,等.社区多元化护理干预对老年心血管疾病病人的影响[J].护理研究,2014,28(9):1149-1150.
[8] 杨广宇,刘欣梅,李笑雨.多元化护理对突发性耳聋患者心理干预的影响[J].吉林医学,2014,35(16):3579-3581.
[9] 蔡兰珠,陈舒燕.早期护理干预对突发性耳聋患者焦虑及生活质量的影响[J].广东医学院学报,2014,32(4):602-603.