中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术与开腹取石术临床疗效及安全性比较

王晓岐,杨建科

(陕西省岐山县医院外三科,陕西 宝鸡,722400)

浏览次数:150次 下载次数:417次

摘要:

目的 分析比较腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术与开腹手术的临床疗效及安全性。方法 选取2010年4月至2015年12月于我院接受治疗的胆总管结石患者52例作为研究对象,根据采取术式的不同将其分为腹腔镜组(行腹腔镜胆总管切开取石) 22例及开腹组(行开腹胆总管切开取石)30例。对两组患者手术指标及并发症发生率进行观察与比较。结果 两组患者手术时间差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者术中出血量、胃肠功能恢复时间及住院时间均明显短于对照组(P<0.05);
腹腔镜组患者并发症发生率为9.09%,明显少于开腹组的56.67%(P<0.05)。结论 与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术简便易行,患者术后恢复较好,安全性高,值得临床推广为首选治疗方法。

关键词:胆总管结石;腹腔镜胆总管切开取石;开腹胆总管切开取石

中图分类号:R657.4 文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2016)27-0099-02

    Comparison of efficacy and safety between laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and open choledocholithotomy
    WANG Xiao-qi, YANG Jian-ke
    (3rd Division in Department of Surgery, Qishan County Hospital, Baoji 722400, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and open choledocholithotomy. Methods Fifty-two cases of patients with choledocholithiasis admitted in our hosiptal from April 2010 to December 2015 were chosen as the study objects. According to the surgery methods, all the patients were divided into laparoscope group with 22 cases (underwent laparoscopic common bile duct lithotomy) and laparotomy group with 30 cases (underwent laparotomic common bile duct lithotomy). The surgery indexes and incidence rate of complications in the two groups were observed and compared. Results The difference in operation time between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05); the amount of bleeding loss, recovery time of gastrointestinal functions and length of hospital stays of the laparoscope group were significantly better than those of the laparotomy group (P<0.05); the occurrence rate of complications in the laparoscope group was 9.09%, which was significantly lower than 56.67% of the laparotomy group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with laparotomic common bile duct lithotomy, laparoscopic common bile duct lithotomy is more easily operated, with better postsurgery recovery and higher safety, which is worthy of clincial promotion to be the primary choice of treatment.
    KEYWORDS: choledocholithiasis; laparoscopic common bile duct lithotomy; laparotomic common bile duct lithotomy

    参考文献:
    [1] 刘宁,刘斌.胆总管结石的诊疗进展[J].中国基层医药,2014,21(13):2057-2058.
    [2] 桑建忠,宋奇峰,黄戬,等.经内镜乳头括约肌切开术(EST)与开腹胆总管切开取石术治疗胆总管结石的疗效对比研究[J].中国现代医生,2013,51(11):49-51.
    [3] 孟兴成,吴志明,储修峰,等.腹腔镜保胆取石并胆总管切开取石Ⅰ期缝合术35例报告[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(3):531-532.
    [4] 许斌,蒋琼,周璐,等.EST 联合LC 术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石临床疗效分析[J].中外医学研究,2015,13(35):38-39.
    [5] 李敏献,邢人伟,鲁葆春.腹腔镜胆道探查术对胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效及安全性评价[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(32):139-141.

    [6] 李统虎,张所山.ERCP 联合腹腔镜硬质胆道镜保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床研究[J].中外医学研究,2015,13(32):56-58.
    [7] 黄燕金,梁永任,廖均平,等.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术对患者肝功能、血黏度及免疫功能的影响[J].中国医药导报,2014,11(20):44-47.
    [8] 甄杰生,袁超杰,蔡世少.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石后一期缝合治疗胆总管结石疗效观察[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(8):40-42.
    [9] 李述剑.腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的安性和有效性[J].中外医学研究,2015,13(23):128-129
    [10] 张剑.胆囊结石合并胆总管结石采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床价值分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2015,20(5):975-976.
    [11] 张乐,白月奎,欧云菘,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床观察[J].中国普通外科杂志,2014,23(8):1141-1143.

上一篇Rss椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果观察

下一篇一次性包皮环切术治疗小儿包茎、包皮过长的临床疗效观察