LEEP刀与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的临床分析

王梅

（岐山县妇幼保健院，陕西 宝鸡，722400）

浏览次数：95次 下载次数：392次

摘要：

目的 讨论LEEP 刀与微波治疗宫颈糜烂患者的效果，为临床治疗提供参考与指导。方法 将我院收治的120 例宫颈糜 烂患者作为研究对象，随机分为观察组与对照组，各60 例。对照组患者实施微波治疗，观察组患者实施LEEP 刀治疗。对比 两组患者的手术情况和并发症发生情况。结果 经过临床统计，观察组患者的手术时间为（5.11±1.03）min，术中出血量为（1.82±0.11）mL，阴道流液时间为（5.23±1.71）d，术后出血量为（12.55±2.07）mL，分别优于对照组的（13.34±2.25）min、（5.42± 2.27）mL、（16.87±2.85）d、（45.82±9.84）mL，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组并发症总发生率为5.00%，显著低于对照组的 18.33%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 与微波治疗比较，LEEP 刀治疗宫颈糜烂患者的治疗效果更好，且手术时间短，出 血量少，安全性高，有助于缓解患者术后疼痛，值得临床推广应用。

关键词：LEEP 刀；微波治疗；宫颈糜烂

中图分类号：R711.3 文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)32-0091-02

Clinical analysis of LEEP knife and microwave in treatment of cervical erosion
WANG Mei
(Qishan County Maternal and Child Health care Hospital, Baoji 722400, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To discuss the effects of LEEP knife and microwave in treatment of patients with cervical erosion, to provide reference and guidance for the clinical treatment. Methods A total of 120 patients with cervical erosion admitted in our hospital were enrolled in the study, and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group was given the microwave therapy, and the observation group was given LEEP knife treatment. The operation indexes and complications in the two groups were compared. Results After clinical statistics, the operation time was (5.11±1.03) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (1.82±0.11) mL, the vaginal fluid flowing time was (5.23±1.71) d, the postoperative blood loss was (12.55±2.07) mL in the observation group, which were better than (13.34±2.25) min, (5.42±2.27) mL, (16.87±2.85) d, (45.82±9.84) mL in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The total incidence of complications in the observation group was 5.00%, which was significantly lower than 18.33% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the microwave treatment, LEEP knife treatment in patients with cervical erosion has better curative effect, with shorter operation time，less amount of bleeding, higher safety, it also can alleviate postoperative pain of patients, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

KEYWORDS: LEEP knife; microwave therapy; cervical erosion

参考文献：
[1] 谢林生,李园园.LEEP 刀和微波在宫颈糜烂治疗中的临床效果及 安全性研究[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(11):1478-1479.
[2] 刘清.LEEP 刀与微波治疗在宫颈糜烂治疗中的临床体会[J].中外 医疗,2016,35(23):54-55.
[3] 任丽霞,宁艳,宁丽.Leep 刀和微波在宫颈糜烂治疗中的临床效果 分析[J].中国卫生产业,2013,11(32):32-33.
[4] 汪风华,潘晓梅.LEEP 刀与微波疗法治疗宫颈糜烂疗效比较观察 [J].安徽医学,2010,31(8):909-910.
[5] 冯海玲.LEEP 刀与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效分析[J].按摩与 康复医学,2010,5(27):109-110.
[6] 余国丽.LEEP 刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床对比分析[J].中国 医药指南,2013,11(14):455-456.
[7] 黄毓媛.LEEP 刀与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效比较[J].中外医学研 究,2011,9(8):10-11.
[8] 谭训清.Leep 刀与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效比较[J].中国现代医 学杂志,2012,22(18):91-93.
[9] 王小伦,谭亚林,彭湘萍.LEEP 刀与微波疗法在治疗宫颈糜烂的临 床效果及对比分析[J].中国医药指南,2012,10(29):579-580.
[10] 彭灵.Leep 刀和微波在宫颈糜烂治疗中的临床效果比较[J].中国 医药指南,2012,10(32):517-518.
[11] 魏凤亭,王龙丰.LEEP 刀与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的临床效果分析 [J].中国医学创新,2016,13(30):98-100.