中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

人工全髋关节置换术与半髋置换术在老年股骨颈骨折治疗中的疗效研究

刘红卫

(陕西省白水县医院骨科,陕西 渭南,715600)

浏览次数:142次 下载次数:406次

摘要:

目的 分析人工全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术在老年股骨颈骨折治疗中的临床效果。方法 本次研究抽取2015 年 4 月至2016 年7 月入我院治疗的66 例老年股骨颈骨折患者为研究对象,依据临床不同治疗方法分为试验组和对照组,每组 33 例患者。其中,将接受人工全髋关节置换术的33 例患者设为试验组,接受半髋置换术的33 例患者设为对照组,观察对比 两组老年股骨颈骨折患者的手术用时、术中出血量、总输血量、住院天数及治疗后疼痛程度。结果 通过对老年股骨颈骨折患 者实施不同方法治疗,试验组患者手术用时为(139.37±22.13)min,同对照组的(105.59±33.20)min 比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的术中出血量、总输血量及住院天数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。从术后髋关节疼痛缓解情况来 看,试验组患者无痛率(72.7%)明显高于对照组(48.5%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在老年股骨颈骨折治疗中,人工 全髋关节置换术与半髋置换术各有优势,但是人工全髋关节置换术可以使患者的疼痛程度明显缓解,因此临床需结合患者 的实际情况进行选择。

关键词:人工全髋关节置换术;半髋关节置换术;老年股骨颈骨折

中图分类号:R687.3 文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2018)02-0104-03

    Clinical effects study of artificial total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fracture
    LIU Hong-wei
    (Orthopedics Department, the Hospital of Baishui County in Shaanxi Province, Weinan 715600, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To analyze the clinical effects of artificial total hip arthro plasty and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fracture. Methods Sixty-six elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted in our hospital from April 2015 to July 2016 were enrolled in this study, and divided into experimental group and control group according to clinical treatment methods, with 33 cases in each group. Patients who underwent artificial total hip arthroplasty were selected as the experimental group, and patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty as the control group. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion, length of hospital stay and post-treatment pain were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Through the implementation of different treatment methods of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture, the operation time of patients in the experimental group was (139.37±22.13) min, which was significantly different from (105.59±33.20) min in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the amount of blood loss, total blood transfusion and length of hospital stay (P>0.05). From the postoperative hip pain relief situation, the pain relief rate (72.7%) in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (48.5%) (P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of elderly femoral neck fracture, artificial total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty both have their advantages, but artificial total hip arthroplasty can effectively alleviate the pain of patients, so it need to base on actual situation of patients when choose the treatment method in clinic.
    KEYWORDS: artificial total hip arthroplasty; hemiarthroplasty; elderly femoral neck fracture

    参考文献:
    [1] 苏国新,卢峰.人工全髋与半髋关节置换治疗老年移位股骨颈骨折对比研究[J].医学信息,2013,25(22):161.
    [2] 吴祖耀,王长涛,吴吉悦.人工全髋与半髋置换术在老年股骨颈骨折治疗中的疗效对比研究[J].中国医药导刊,2013,15(10):1647-1648.
    [3] 廖永华,张渊.股骨颈骨折[M].西安:第四军医大学出版社,2014.
    [4] 李龙.全髋置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效对比[J].河北医学,2013,19(4):498-500.
    [5] 樊建平,陈满华.人工全髋与半髋置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].实用临床医学,2016,17(8):40-41.
    [6] 詹世安,丁晟,宋国全.全髋与半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨 折的疗效研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(5):475-477.
    [7] 黄科,黄红君,刘德恒.全髋关节置换术和半髋关节置换术治疗老 年股骨颈骨折的临床探讨[J].中国医药指南,2014,12(19).
    [8] 唐庆会,唐媛.全髋置换与半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效对 比分析[J].中国伤残医学,2013,21(6):98-99.
    [9] 高翔.人工全髋关节置换与生物型半髋置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨 折对比研究[J].当代医学,2015,21(36):38-39.
    [10] 郝林杰,邱裕生,张育民,等.全髋与半髋置换术治疗老年人股骨颈 骨折疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(2):118-123.
    [11] 王军,薛卫平.老年股骨颈骨折全髋与半髋关节置换术的疗效对 比[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(12):1605-1607.

上一篇经尿道2 μm 激光联合经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生的效果

下一篇平片式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果观察