产后出血患者经宫腔水囊压迫治疗效果分析

张晓霞

（陕西省商洛市中心医院妇产科，陕西商洛，726000）

浏览次数：142次 下载次数：422次

摘要：

目的 探究产后出血患者经宫腔水囊压迫治疗的临床效果。方法 选取我院收治的84例产后出血患者，依据治疗方法分为观察组和对照组，各42例。观察组实施宫腔水囊压迫治疗，对照组实施宫腔纱条止血。观察两组临床治疗效果、显效时间及术后48h出血量。结果 观察组止血总有效率为95.34%，高于对照组的73.81%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；观察组显效时间为（286.46±60.33)s，低于对照组的（309.05±39.74）s，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；两组患者取出后48h出血量比较，差异无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 产后出血患者实施宫腔水囊压迫治疗疗效显著，起效快，可减少取出后48h出血量。

关键词：产后出血；宫腔水囊压迫；宫腔纱条

中图分类号：R714.461文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)07-0080-02

Analysis of the effect of uterine water sac compression in patients with postpartum hemorrhage

ZHANG Xiao-xia

(Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shangluo Central Hospital, Shangluo 726000, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To explore the effect of uterine water sac compression in patients with postpartum hemorrhage. Methods Eighty -four cases of patients with postpartum hemorrhage in our hospital were selected and divided into observation group and control group according to the treatment methods, with 42 cases in each group. The observatio group were given the implementation of uterine cavity water sac compression, while the patients in control group were given the implementation of uterine cavity gauze to stop bleeding. The clinical treatment effect, effective time, and the amount of bleeding after 48h of the two groups were observed. Results The total effective rate of hemostasis of the observation group was 95.34%, which was significantly higher than 73.81% of the patients in control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The effective time of the patients in observation group was (286.46±60.33) s, which was significantly lower than (309.05±39.74) s of the patients in control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in blood loss after the removal between the patients in two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with postpartum hemorrhage, uterine cavity water sac compression treatment has significant efficacy, which has rapid onset and can reduce the amount of bleeding after 48h after removal.

KEYWORDS: postpartum hemorrhage; intrauterine water sac compression; intrauterine ribbon gauze

参考文献：
[1] 施萍,刘爱民.水囊压迫宫腔治疗产后出血25例分析[J].中外医学研究,2014,12(11):114-115.
[2] 黄英,陈平.前置胎盘患者剖宫产产后出血治疗中应用宫腔水囊压迫的效果分析[J].中国医学创新,2015,12(22):142-144.
[3] 辛艳,贾素玲.宫腔水囊压迫法治疗阴道分娩产后出血的疗效分析[J].内蒙古中医药,2015,34(12):19-20.
[4] 王莉.宫腔水囊压迫止血治疗产后大出血的临床效果评价[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(8):108-109.
[5] 彭玉芝.纱布填塞与宫腔水囊压迫治疗产后大出血的临床效果比较[J].中外女性健康研究,2016(4):191-192.
[6] 周志武.水囊压迫法与纱布填塞法治疗产后出血临床对比分析[J].临床医学工程,2015,22(8):1018-1019.
[7] 朱正超.自制水囊宫腔填塞治疗产后出血15例总结[J].中外女性健康研究,2015(19):34-35.
[8] 吴琼丽.水囊压迫与纱布填塞治疗产后大出血在我国基层医院的应用效果[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(21):79-82.
[9] 苏静兰.产后出血使用水囊压迫的临床效果观察[J].中国医药指南,2014,12(16):171-172.
[10] 张文艳.自制简易水囊治疗产后出血的临床研究[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(4):100-101.