中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

不同麻醉方法对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者的效果对比分析

钟宝军

(陕西省榆林市子洲县人民医院麻醉科,陕西 榆林,718499)

浏览次数:81次 下载次数:404次

摘要:

目的 对比分析不同麻醉方法用于腹腔镜子宫切除术患者的效果。方法 选择2014年4月至2016年4月在我院接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的53例患者为研究对象,随机将所有患者分为观察组和对照组,观察组患者采用全身麻醉,对照组患者采用硬膜外麻醉,对比两组患者的临床指标及麻醉效果。结果 观察组患者气腹后5min和停止气腹后5min的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)水平明显低于对照组,清醒时间、拔管时间、自主呼吸恢复时间也明显短于对照组,差异均具有统计学意 义(P<0.05)。结论 对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者使用全身的效果和安全性明显优于使用硬膜外麻醉,效果显著,值得临床推广使用。

关键词:全身麻醉;硬膜外麻醉;腹腔镜子宫切除术

中图分类号:R614文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)11-0044-02

    Comparative analysis of the effects of different anesthesia methods on laparoscopic hysterectomy patients
    ZHONG Bao-jun
    (Department of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Zizhou County, Yulin 718499, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To compare the effects of different anesthesia methods on patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods Fifty-three cases of patients who treated with laparoscopic hysterectomy in our hospital from April 2014 to April 2016 were selected as the study objects, all the patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group accepted general anesthesia, and the control group received epidural anesthesia. The clinical indicators and anesthesia effects of two groups were compared. Results Five minutes after pneumoperitoneum and 5 minutes after stop pneumoperitoneum, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of the observation group were lower than those of the control group; the recovery time, extubation time and spontaneous breathing recovery time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of general anesthesia on patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy are better than those of epidural anesthesia. The effect is significant, and it is worth to be popularized and used in clinic.

    KEYWORDS: general anesthesia; epidural anesthesia; laparoscopic hysterectomy

    参考文献:
    [1] 谭凤翠.不同麻醉方法用于腹腔镜子宫切除术效果比较[J].中国实用医刊,2014,41(2):101-102
    [2] 路凤英.比较不同麻醉方法在腹腔镜子宫切除术患者中的应用效果[J].中国民康医学,2015,27(19):43-44.
    [3] 林盛敏.用不同的麻醉方法对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者进行麻醉的效果对比[J].当代医药论丛,2015,13(21):230-231.
    [4] 高泉.不同麻醉方法对腹腔镜子宫切除患者的临床效果分析[J].白求恩医学杂志,2014,12(2):158-159.
    [5] 代玉超,于鹏,刘晓花.不同麻醉方法用于腹腔镜子宫切除术患者的效果[J].中国医药指南,2015,13(17):115-116.
    [6] 王良凤.不同麻醉方法用于腹腔镜子宫切除术患者的效果[J].医学信息,2015,28(30):115-116.
    [7] 薛卫东,李海龙,张先锋.不同麻醉方法在腹腔镜子宫切除术中的效果分析[J].右江民族医学院学报,2014,36(3):398-399.
    [8] 曲颖.不同麻醉方法用于腹腔镜子宫切除术的效果研究[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志:电子版,2016,3(3):68.

上一篇预注甲氧明对剖宫产产妇腰硬联合麻醉术中低血压的临床效果

下一篇舒芬太尼与瑞芬太尼应用于骨科手术患者中的麻醉效果对比