早期椎体减压术对脊柱骨折后神经功能恢复情况的影响

刘兴国1，鱼红进1，杨益宏1，宋明辉1，张煜坤2

（1. 陕西省西安市西安高新医院骨科一病区，陕西 西安，710077；2. 陕西省西安市第四军医大学西京医院骨科，

浏览次数：147次 下载次数：319次

摘要：

目的 探讨早期椎体减压术对脊柱骨折后神经功能恢复情况的影响。方法 收集我院与西京医院2016年1月1日至2016年6月30日创伤性脊髓损伤患者79例，根据手术开始时间分为观察组（<24 h）与对照组（ ≧24 h）。通过观察术前与术 后3个月患者椎体形态、脊髓损伤水平评分（ASIA评分）、日本骨科协会评估治疗（JOA）评分及血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、S100B、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）水平比较患者术后神经功能恢复情况。结果 JOA评分与ASIS评分显示，两组患者术 后恢复程度无统计学差异（P>0.05）；术后3个月，观察组血清S100B、SOD水平较对照组恢复程度好，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）；观察组Cobb角、矢状径、椎间隙高度及后凸畸形度较对照组更优，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；两组术后呼吸系统并 发症较多，但两组相比无明显差异（P=0.691）。结论 创伤性脊髓损伤于伤后24 h 内紧急手术治疗与伤后24~72 h内手术治疗患者的神经功能恢复无明显差别，但其相关血清因子水平以及功能恢复程度明显提高。

关键词：早期治疗；椎体减压术；神经功能恢复

中图分类号：R651.1文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)13-0005-04

Influence on the recovery of nerve function after spinal fracture by early decompression of vertebral body
LIU Xing-guo 1, YU Hong-jin 1, YANG Yi-hong 1, SONG Ming-hui 1, ZHANG Yu-kun 2
(1. the First Ward of Orthopedics Department, Xi an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi an 710077; 2. Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi an 710032, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the effect of early decompression of the vertebral body on the recovery of neurological function after spinal fracture. Methods A total of 79 cases of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury in our hospital and Xijing Hospital from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016 were selected and divided into observation group (<24 h) and control group ( ≧24 h) according to the start time of the operation. The postoperative neurological function recovery were compared by vertebral morphology, spinal cord injury score (ASIS score), Japanese orthopedic association assessment (JOA) score and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100B, superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels before operation and 3 months after operation. Results JOA and ASIS scores in the two groups showed no significant difference in postoperative recovery degree (P=0.544). The levels of serum S100B and SOD in the observation group were better than those in the control group after 3 months operation (P<0.01). The Cobb angle, sagittal diameter, intervertebral height and kyphosis in the observation group had significant improvement compared with those in the control group (P<0.05). There were much postoperative respiratory complications between the two groups, with no statistical significance (P =0.691). Conclusion Compared with patients undergo surgery at 24 ~ 72 h after injury, patients having emergency surgery within 24 h after injury has similar neural functional recovery, but the related factor levels and function recovery degree increase significantly.

KEYWORDS: early treatment; vertebral decompression; nerve function recovery

参考文献：
[1] 唐勇,贾治伟,吴剑宏,等.脊髓型颈椎病预后相关因素的研究进展 [J].中国骨伤,2016,29(3):216-219.
[2] 蒋伟宇,周龙,赵刘军,等.Denis域型骶骨骨折伴神经损伤早期手术疗效分析[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(6):493-495.
[3] 王财兴,尹雪兰.急性脊柱创伤诊断及急性脊柱创伤手术治疗方法 [J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(57):188-193.
[4] SRIKANDARAJAH N,BOISSAUD-COOKE MA,CLARK S,et al.Does early surgical decompression in cauda equina syndrome improve bladderoutcome?[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2015,40(8):580-583.
[5] HU X,PEI F,WANG G,et al.Application triangular osteosynthesis for vertical unstable sacral fractures[J].Eur Spine J,2013,22(3):503-509.
[6] FEHLINGS MG,BARRY S,KOPJAR B,et al.Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(26):2247-2252.
[7] SEVKI K,MEHMET T,UFUK T,et al.Results of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior cervical corpectomy and stabilization[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2004,29(22):2493-2500.
[8] 王刚祥,周海东,赵阳虎,等.非相邻多节段脊柱骨折诊治分析[J].临床骨科杂志,2015,18(6):655-657.
[9] 伊力哈尔·沙迪克. 手术与非手术治疗脊柱骨折老年患者的疗效 [J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(20):4522-4523.
[10] LEVI L,WOLF A,RIGAMONTI D,et al.Anterior decompression in cervical spine trauma: does the timing of surgery affect the outcome?[J]. Neurosurg,1991,29(2):216-222.
[11] MIRZA SK,KRENGEL WR,CHAPMAN JR,et al.Early versus delayed surgery for acute cervical spinal cord injury[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1999(359):104-114.
[12] DUH MS,SHEPARD MJ,WILBERGER JE,et al.The effectiveness ofsurgery on the treatment of acute spinal cord injury and its relation to pharmacological treatment[J].Neurosurg,1994,35(2):248-249.
[13] CHEN L,YANG H,YANG T,et al.Effectiveness of surgical treatment for traumatic central cord syndrome[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2009,10(1):3-8. [14] CROCE MA,BEE TK,PRITCHARD E,et al.Does optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist?[J].Ann Surg,2001,233(6):851-858.
[15] CENGIZ SL,KALKAN E,BAYIR A,et al.Timing of thoracolomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. A real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study [J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2008,128(9):959-966.
[16] LEONE A,MARINO M,DELL`ATTI C,et al.Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis [J].Rheumatol Int,2016,36 (10):1335 -1346.
[17] ROSA GL,CONTI A,CARDALI S,et al.Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a Meta -analytical approach [J].Spinal Cord, 2004,42(9):503-512.
[18] FEHLINGS MG,NATER A,HOLMER H.Cost -effectiveness of surgery in the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a systematic review[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2014,39(22 Suppl 1): S99-S105.