综合护理干预对老年脑梗塞患者治疗效果的影响

韩秀丽

（陕西省渭南市大荔县医院内科，陕西 渭南，715100）

浏览次数：69次 下载次数：403次

摘要：

目的 探讨综合护理干预对老年脑梗塞患者的治疗效果。方法 选择我院2012年3月至2015年3月收治的老年脑梗塞患者120例，随机分为观察组和对照组，每组60 例。对照组采用常规护理模式，观察组采用综合护理干预措施，比较两组治疗总有效率、治疗前后NIHSS评分以及ADL评分。结果 观察组总有效率（95.0%）高于对照组（76.6%），两组比较，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；治疗前两组患者NIHSS评分及ADL评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；治疗后，两组患者 NIHSS 评分及ADL评分均优于治疗前（P<0.05）；观察组NIHSS评分及ADL评分明显优于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 综合护理干预能够提高老年脑梗塞患者治疗效果，改善患者神经功能，提高患者日常生活能力，值得借鉴。

关键词：综合护理；老年脑梗塞；NIHSS 评分；ADL 评分

中图分类号：R473.74文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2016)25-0175-02

The curative effect of comprehensive care intervention on patients with senile cerebral infarction
HAN Xiu-li
(Department of Internal Medicine, Dali County Hospital of Weinan, Weinan 715100, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To explore the treatment effect of comprehensive care intervention on patients with senile cerebral infarction. Methods One hundred and twenty cases of patients with senile cerebral infarction were selected in our hospital from March 2012 to March 2015, and divided into observation group and control group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group was given conventional care mode, while the observation group was given comprehensive care intervention, then the treatment effect, NIHSS scores and ADL scores of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 95.0%, which was higher than 76.7% of the control group, the difference between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05); before treatment, the differences of NIHSS and ADL scores between the two groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05), after treatment, NIHSS and ADL scores of the two groups were significantly better than those before the treatment (P<0.05); NIHSS and ADL scores of the observation group were obviously better than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive care intervention can increase the treatment effect on elderly patients with cerebral infarction, and improve their nerve function and ability of daily life, which is worth of using for reference.
KEYWORDS: comprehensive care intervention; senile cerebral infarction; NIHSS score; ADL score

参考文献：
[1] 范春芳,陈旭义,梁晋.四种药物治疗急性脑梗死的成本-效果分析 [J].中国基层医药,2014,圆员(21):3209-3211.
[2] 童丽灵,戴小萍,邓颜梅,等.新加坡综合护理干预对老年急性脑梗 死患者康复的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2013,13(32):6365-6368.
[3] 康可歆.护理干预模式对老年脑梗死偏瘫患者治疗依从性的影响 [J].齐鲁护理杂志,2013,19(3):1-2.
[4] 邸宁宁.缺血性脑卒中的OCSP 分型与NIHSS 评分、临床神经功能 缺损评分及预后之间相关性研究[D].银川:宁夏医科大学,2010.
[5] 杨林,王玲,沈曼璇,等.连续护理干预对老年轻度认知障碍病人 MMSE、ADL 评分的影响[J].全科护理,2015,13(14):1264-1267.
[6] 熊学勤.综合护理干预对老年脑梗塞患者疗效的影响[J].中国保健 营养(下旬刊),2012,22(7):2028.
[7] 孟水云,刘淑英.护理干预对老年脑梗死患者康复期治疗效果的影 响[J].中国实用护理杂志,2011,27(3):63-64.
[8] 赵丹.护理干预对脑梗死患者治疗依从性及生活质量的影响[J].中 国实用医药,2011,6(18):215-216.
[9] 刘存富,王建明.某院脑梗死患者二级预防服药依从性及用药现状 调查[J].中国药业,2015,24(19):70-71.