中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

PKP 和PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折临床疗效的初步探讨

辛梦玺,马宁强

(杨凌示范区医院,陕西 咸阳,712100)

浏览次数:121次 下载次数:337次

摘要:

目的 探讨经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术(PKP)和经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效。 方法 选取在本院确诊为骨质疏松性压缩骨折患者98例,随机分为PKP组(53 例)和PVP组(45 例),分别采用PKP和PVP治疗。对比分析两组患者术前、术后1月及术后1年的VAS评分、椎体高度和椎体后凸Cobb 角。结果 PKP组患者术后1月 及1年VAS评分、椎体高度和椎体后凸Cobb角较术前均明显改善(P<0.01);PVP组术后1 月及1 年的VAS评分较术前明显改善(P<0.01)。PKP组术后1 年的VAS评分明显低于PVP组(P<0.01),术后1 月及1 年的椎体高度和椎体后凸Cobb 角明显优于PVP 组(P<0.01)。结论 PKP 和PVP 治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的近期疼痛缓解效果良好,而PKP在椎体高度恢 复、后凸畸形矫正及远期疼痛症状缓解方面优势更加显著。

关键词:PKP;PVP;骨质疏松;椎体压缩骨折

中图分类号:R473.6文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)21-0080-02

    Preliminary study on the clinical efficacy of PKP and PVP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
    XIN Meng-xi, MA Ning-qiang
    (Yangling Demonstraction Zone Hospital, Xianyang 712100, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods Ninty-eight patients with osteoporotic compression fractures diagnosed in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into PKP group (n=53) and PVP group (n=45), and they used PKP and PVP respectively. The VAS score, vertebral height and vertebral kyphosis Cobb angle were measured before operation, 1 month after operation and 1 year after operation. Results The VAS score, vertebral height and kyphotic angle of Cobb in the PKP group significantly improved at 1 month and 1 year after operation (P<0.01). In the PVP group, the VAS scores at 1 month and 1 year after operation significantly improved (P<0.01). The VAS score of the PKP group at 1 year after operation was significantly lower than that of PVP group (P<0.01), and the vertebral height and vertebral kyphosis Cobb angle at 1 month and 1 year after operation were significantly better than those in the PVP group (P<0.01). Conclusion Although both PKP and PVP had benifical efficacy in alleviating short-time pain for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, PKP treatment is a more effective treatment in vertebral height recovery, kyphosis correction and long-term pain relief.
    KEYWORDS: PKP; PVP; osteoporosis; vertebral compression fracture

    参考文献:
    [1] 丁惠宇,夏建龙.PVP、PKP 治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩骨折的疗效评价标准研究进展[J].山东医药,2014,54(14):101-103.
    [2] 刘康,张晓越.经皮椎体成形术和经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的疗效对比[J].临床医学工程,2014,21(6):727-728.
    [3] 解思信,祝恺,刘鑫.PKP 与PVP 治疗骨质疏松性腰椎压缩骨折的临床疗效对比[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(19):1-3.
    [4] 温晓阳,余凯龙,何东生,等.PKP 与PVP 治疗陈旧性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折效果对比观察[J].山东医药,2016,56(42):59-61.
    [5] 刘志斌,葛郁龙,贺永进.经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的进展[J].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2012,6(18):146-147.
    [6] 刘少军,杜随勇,滕云升,等.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗B 型新鲜骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床研究[J].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2014,8(10):51-54.
    [7] 王佳,周耀,竺智雄,等.PVP 和PKP 治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2012,18(10):872-875.

上一篇椎弓根螺钉联合连接棒内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床研究

下一篇微创钢板螺栓加压内固定系统治疗跟骨骨折的效果观察