连续性个性化助产服务对初产妇产时疼痛及妊娠结局的影响

梁丽华

（宁强县天津医院妇产科，陕西 汉中，724400）

浏览次数：59次 下载次数：438次

摘要：

目的 探讨连续性个性化助产服务对初产妇产时疼痛及妊娠结局的影响。方法 选择本院2014年9月至2015年11月收治的82例初产妇为研究对象，随机将其分为观察组与对照组，每组41 例。给予对照组常规助产服务，给予观察组连续性个性化助产服务。比较两组产妇产时疼痛程度、妊娠结局及助产服务满意度。结果 观察组产妇产时0 度、Ⅲ度疼痛发生率明 显优于对照组（P<0.05）；两组产妇产时Ⅰ度、Ⅱ度疼痛程度发生率对比，无明显差异（P>0.05）；观察组产妇产后2 h内出血量及新生儿评分均优于对照组（P<0.05）；观察组产妇助产服务总满意度高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 给予初产妇连续性个性化助产服务，可有效降低产妇产时痛感，提高助产服务满意度，改善初产妇的妊娠结局，具有较高的临床应用价值。

关键词：连续性个性化助产服务；初产妇；产时疼痛；妊娠结局

中图分类号：R473.71文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)22-0187-02

The influence of the continuous and personalized midwifery service on intrapartum pain and

pregnancy outcome in primipara
LIANG Li-hua
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Hospital of Ningqiang County, Hanzhong 724400, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To discuss the influence of the continuous and personalized midwifery service on intrapartum pain and pregnancy outcome in primipara. Methods From September 2014 to November 2015, 82 cases of primipara in our hospital were selected as study objects, and were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group, with 41 cases in each group. The control group accepted the routine midwifery service, and the treatment group received the continuous and personalized midwifery service. The degree of intrapartum pain, pregnancy outcome and satisfaction of the midwifery service in the two groups were compared. Results The degree 0 and Ⅲ of intrapartum pain of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the degree Ⅰ and Ⅱ of intrapartum pain of the two groups (P>0.05). The postpartum bleeding amount in 2 h and neonatal score of the treatment group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). The total satisfaction of midwifery service of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The continuous and personalized midwifery service can reduce the intrapartum pain, improve the satisfaction of the midwifery service and the pregnancy outcome of primipara, which has high clinical application value.
KEYWORDS: the continuous and personalized midwifery service; primipara; intrapartum pain; pregnancy outcome

参考文献：
[1] 胡静,肖红,邹颖,等.无保护会阴分娩技术用于初产妇会阴分娩效果的Meta 分析[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(4):413-419.
[2] 郑丽萍.不同护理干预策略对剖宫产术后初产妇排尿的影响分析[J].浙江医学,2016,38(12):1033-1035.
[3] 林白浪,王曙红,夏杰琼,等.降低初产妇会阴侧切率对新生儿窒息的影响分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2016,26(15):3538-3540.
[4] 李旻,张巧.初产妇产后早期盆腔器官脱垂相关影响因素分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2016,24(6):399-403,414.
[5] 黄华,李静.聚焦解决模式对初产妇应对方式、情绪及分娩结局的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(23):3351-3354.
[6] 刘欣.初产妇产前焦虑抑郁情绪对产程行为、顺产率的影响[J].护理研究,2016,30(10):1276-1277.
[7] 范如珍.分阶段体位调整对初产妇妊娠结局及新生儿的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(15):3044-3046.
[8] 刘婷婷,曾红梅.护理干预对自然分娩初产妇焦虑及产后疼痛出血的影响[J].河北医学,2015,21(10):1721-1724.