中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

微创拔牙术和传统拔牙术在上颌磨牙拔除中的研究对比

冯芳杰

(陕西省扶风县中医医院口腔科,陕西 宝鸡,722200)

浏览次数:115次 下载次数:339次

摘要:

目的 探讨微创拔牙术和传统拔牙术在上颌磨牙拔除中的效果。方法 将本院2013 年1 月至2015 年12 月收治的174例行 上颌磨牙拔除的患者随机均分为对照组和观察组,各87 例。对照组实施传统拔牙术,观察组实施微创拔牙术,比较两组患者畏 惧程度、牙槽完整度和术后不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组患者的畏惧程度和牙槽窝完整程度明显优于对照组(P<0.05),且观 察组患者疼痛、张口困难和牙龈肿胀等术后不良反应明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 相比于传统拔牙术,采用微创拔牙技术实 施上颌磨牙拔除的手术效果明显更佳,术中对牙槽窝损伤少,术后不良反应低,可以减少患者对手术的不良心理反应,安全有效。

关键词:微创拔牙术;传统拔牙术;上颌磨牙拔除

中图分类号:R782.2文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)32-0113-02

    Comparison of study effect between minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction in the removal

    of maxillary molars
    FENG Fang-jie
    (Department of Stomatology, Fufeng County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Baoji 722200, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the effects of minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction in maxillary molar removal. Methods A total of 174 patients undergoing maxillary molars removal treatment in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2015 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 87 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional tooth extraction, the observation group was treated with minimally invasive extraction. The fear extent, integrity degree of alveolar socket and postoperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The fear extent and the integrity degree of alveolar socket in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the pain, mouth opening difficulty and gingival swelling of the patients in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional extraction, minimally invasive tooth extraction in maxillary molar removal is more effective, it has fewer injuries to the alveolar socket during operation and less postoperative adverse reactions, and could reduce the patient``s adverse psychological reaction to the operation, the treatment is safe and effective.
    KEYWORDS: minimally invasive tooth extraction; traditional extraction; maxillary molars removal

    参考文献:
    [1] 刘婷,赵宏宠.微创拔牙术与传统拔牙术在上颌磨牙拔除中的比较 研究[J].中国临床医生,2014,42(7):84-85.
    [2] 曾远胜,黄娴君,麦海光,等.上颌磨牙微创拔牙术与传统拔牙术的 临床观察[J].现代医院,2013,13(5):38-39.
    [3] 陈伟.微创拔牙术与传统拔牙术在上颌磨牙拔除的比较研究[J].中 国医疗美容,2014,4(6):202.
    [4] 胡艺平,金桂芳,胡丽风,等.不同麻醉方法应用于上颌磨牙拔除的 临床对比[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志:电子版,2014,8(4):334-336.
    [5] 谭剑华.微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J].大家健康 (下旬版),2016,10(9):120.
    [6] 李科.微创拔牙术在正畸牙拔除中的应用效果观察[J].海南医学,2013,24(7):1048-1049.

上一篇鼻内窥镜术治疗难治性鼻出血疗效分析

下一篇冠脉造影术中肱动脉穿刺的常见并发症及处理