中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

腹腔镜术与传统开腹术治疗胆囊结石效果分析

白晓双

(汉中市略阳县人民医院,陕西 汉中,724300)

浏览次数:76次 下载次数:395次

摘要:

目的 分析比较传统开腹术与腹腔镜术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果。方法 选取我院2013 年3 月至2016 年3 月收治的 100 例胆囊结石患者为研究对象,根据不同手术方式分为观察组和对照组,各50 例。观察组给予腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组给 予传统开腹手术治疗。比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量和护理满意度。结果 观察组患者手术时间、住院时 间及术中出血量均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的护理满意度为98.00%,高于对照组的86.00%,差 异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜术治疗效果更好,缩短了手术时间和住院时间,减少了术中出 血量,提高了护理满意度,值得临床推广应用。

关键词:传统开腹术;腹腔镜术;胆囊结石

中图分类号:R657.4文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2018)03-0075-02

    Effect analysis of laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy surgery in the treatment of gallstone
    BAI Xiao-shuang
    (the People``s Hospital of Lveyang County in Hanzhong, Hanzhong 724300, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To analyze the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy surgery in the treatment of gallstone. Methods A total of 100 gallstone patients in our hospital from March 2013 to March 2016 were selected as research objects, and divided into control group and observation group according to different surgical methods, with 50 cases in each group. The observation group was given laparoscopic surgery and the control group was given traditional laparotomy surgery. The operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss in the observation group were better than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 98.00%, which was higher than 86.00% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopic surgery has better curative effect than traditional laparotomy surgery, it can shorten the operation time and hospitalization time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, improve the satisfaction of nursing, which is worthy of promotion in clinic.
    KEYWORDS: traditional laparotomy surgery; laparoscopic surgery; gallstone

    参考文献:
    [1] 马文贵,杨振琪.腹腔镜胆道探查术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床价值比较[J].华夏医学,2015,28(2):30-32.
    [2] 蓝建平.腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石与传统开腹手术临床对比分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2014,21(4):619-621.
    [3] 杨贵江,胡晓芳.对比分析腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统开腹切除术治 疗胆结石的临床效果[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(11):75-76.
    [4] JANION A,PURTAK J,KOSTEWICZ W.Quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for cholecystolithiasis in patients with concomitant cardiovascular diseases[J].Polish J Surg,2010,82(3):140-146.
    [5] 于江涛,黄强,王军.腹腔镜胆道探查术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊 结石合并胆总管结石的临床价值比较[J].安徽医科大学学报,2012,47(5):615-616.
    [6] 张磊.内镜联合腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆管结石的临床比较[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2012,37(8):979-980.
    [7] 吴卫国,程平,刘安成,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石临床疗效比较[J].肝胆外科杂志,2013,21(6):457-458.

上一篇外科手术治疗肝硬化合并肝胆结石的临床方法与效果观察

下一篇全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较